新航道雅思團(tuán)隊(duì)范文-建更多鐵路和地鐵好，還是修擴(kuò)更多道路好？

2018年7月7日雅思大作文題目：建更多鐵路和地鐵好還是修建更多道路好

People have different views on how to reduce traffic congestion. Some think that governments should build more train and subway lines, while others think that building more roads and widening existing roads will reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 

解析&審題

 

本題是關(guān)于城市生活中的交通問題。此類問題是雅思考試的?？?，各位烤鴨需要認(rèn)真對待。唐老師目前收集到的相關(guān)考題如下：

The best way for the government to solve the traffic congestion is to provide free public transport 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (2014/1/9，2017/1/21)

解決交通堵塞問題的辦法是全天候提供免費(fèi)公共交通，你是否同意?

 

In many towns and cities, the high volume of road traffic has been a problem. What are the causes and what actions can be taken to solve the traffic problem?  (2012/7/21)

交通堵塞的原因是什么，怎么解決？

 

In some countries,the government has tried to reduce traffic.For instance,they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour. Do you think this development is positive or negative? (2016/1/30)

高峰期征受堵塞稅能否解決交通堵塞問題？

 

Increasing the price of cars and petrol is one of the best ways to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?(2018/3/10)

提高汽車及汽油價(jià)格是解決交通和污染問題的辦法，你是否同意？

 

Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside. To what extent do you agree with this opinion?(2018/5/5)

將大公司和工廠搬遷到鄉(xiāng)村地區(qū)，可以解決城市交通和住房問題。你同意嗎？

本題問的是：解決交通堵塞問題有兩種方案，一種是修建更多鐵路和地鐵，另一種是修建或擴(kuò)展更多道路，要求你討論哪一種方法更好。

 

這類題目的基本思路應(yīng)該是用雙邊討論的結(jié)構(gòu)，首先討論修建鐵路和地鐵的好處和壞處，然后討論修建道路的好處和壞處，最后給出自己的結(jié)論（無非是根據(jù)不同城市的情況來決定到底哪一種方案更合適）。

 

修建新鐵路和地鐵：好處當(dāng)然是運(yùn)載量大，污染相對較小，壞處是成本高昂，且耗時(shí)很長;

 

修建道路：好處是成本低，耗時(shí)少，但壞處就是污染大，且占用大量城市空間。

 

我的觀點(diǎn)：對于那些面積而分散的城市，應(yīng)該新建鐵路和地鐵；對于那些空間小，而且多數(shù)人都開車上下班的城市來說，則應(yīng)該多修道路或者擴(kuò)修已有道路。

 

新航道團(tuán)隊(duì)范文

 

01

 

There seem to be two equally effective ways of reducing urban traffic congestion: building more train and subway lines and building more new roads or widening the existing roads. To my mind, whether one way is better than the other depends upon the city conditions.

 

減少城市交通擁堵似乎有兩種同樣有效的方法：修建更多的火車和地鐵線路以及修建更多的新道路或拓寬現(xiàn)有道路。在我看來，一種方法是否比另外一種方法更好，取決于城市的條件。

 

解析

（1） 本段直接進(jìn)入話題，提出改善城市交通的兩種辦法，然后給出自己的觀點(diǎn)：到底哪一種辦法更好取決于城市的條件。

（2） equally 同樣地

（3） urban 城市的

（4） to my mind 在我看來

（5） depend upon 取決于

 

02

 

It is quite obvious that train and subway lines are able to carry more passengers than roads, especially in a given period of time, and therefore are every effective in reducing the traffic in rush hours. The subway, for example, can deliver more than 10,000 people in as short as half an hour, who, if all travel by buses or cars, will pose tremendous pressure to the traffic. However, though causing less pollution, it is pretty costly and time-consuming to build a new train and subway line. The city dwellers will often have to endure a few years’ traffic inconveniences before they can enjoy the benefits that a new train and subway line brings to them. 

 

很明顯，鐵路和地鐵線路的載客量比道路要多，特別是在一段給定時(shí)間內(nèi)，因此在減少高峰時(shí)期的交通方面是十分有效的。例如，地鐵可以在短短半小時(shí)內(nèi)運(yùn)送1萬多人，如果這1萬多人都乘公共汽車或汽車出行，將對交通造成巨大的壓力。然而，盡管污染更少，建造一條新的火車和地鐵線路是非常昂貴和耗時(shí)的。城市居民常常要忍受幾年的交通不便，才能享受到新的火車和地鐵線路給他們帶來的好處。

 

解析

（1） 本段論述修建鐵路和地鐵的好處和壞處。

（2） a given period of time 一段給定時(shí)間

（3） rush hours 交通高峰時(shí)段

（4） deliver 運(yùn)送

（5） pose 構(gòu)成

（6） tremendous 巨大的

（7） time-consuming 耗時(shí)的

（8） city dwellers 城市居民

（9） endure 忍受

 

 

03

 

By contrast, building a new road or widening an existing road will take far less time and money. It is usually a matter of a few days or weeks before the city people can enjoy a new or a widened road. The problem, however, is that compared with the train or subway line, the roads can solve the traffic congestion but only to a very limited extent. Besides, too many roads will take up a lot of urban spaces, which are often already very crowded. 

 

相比之下，建造一條新路或拓寬一條現(xiàn)有道路所需的時(shí)間和金錢要少得多。城市居民通常只需要幾天或幾個星期就能享受到一條新的或拓寬的道路。然而問題是，與火車或地鐵線路相比，道路只能在非常有限的程度上解決交通擁擠。此外，太多的道路會占用大量本已非常擁擠的城市空間。

 

解析

 （1）本段討論擴(kuò)修道路的好處和壞處。

（2）by contrast 相反

 (3)  a matter of a few days or weeks 幾天或幾周的事情

（4）to a very limited extent 在非常有限的程度上

（5）take up 占用

 

04

 

In my view, both ways are effective to address the traffic problem in cities, but it is the city conditions that will determine which way is better. To a cosmopolitan like New York and Beijing, where the huge population live far and wide apart, more train and subway lines may be preferable, but to such a small city as Providence with a small area and small population where most people drive to and from work, more and wider roads are perhaps more necessary. 

 

在我看來，這兩種方法都能有效地解決城市的交通問題，但決定哪一條道路更好的是城市的條件。像紐約和北京這樣的國際大都市人口眾多，相距遙遠(yuǎn)，更多的火車和地鐵線路可能更好，但在普羅維登斯這樣的小城市，面積小，人口少，大多數(shù)人都開車上下班，更多更寬的道路也許更為必要。

 

解析

（1）本段闡述自己的觀點(diǎn)。在雙邊討論的結(jié)構(gòu)中，闡明自己的觀點(diǎn)非常重要。本題中，唐老師認(rèn)為兩種方法都有效，但具體采用哪種辦法，得根據(jù)城市的實(shí)際情況來決定。

（2）address 解決

（3）determine 決定

（4）cosmopolitan 國際大都市

（5）preferable 更好的

（6）to and from work 上下班

 

更多關(guān)于無錫雅思、無錫托福相關(guān)內(nèi)容請關(guān)注無錫新航道官方網(wǎng)址：www.alugueltemporadaflorianopolis.com