支招小作文（131） | 靜態(tài)圖 四個(gè)國(guó)家的發(fā)電方式

The charts below show the source of electricity produced in four different countries in 2020. 

類型：靜態(tài)圖——多餅圖

寫作注意點(diǎn)：分段合理性、餅圖之間的比較

The pie charts illustrate the proportion of electricity generated in three different ways by four countries in a particular year. 

【開頭段：概括圖表主要內(nèi)容，通過同義替換改寫題目。】

Overall, all the four countries were dependent on clean energy such as hydropower and nuclear energy, while fossil fuel was not widely applied in most of them. 

【總結(jié)段：概括圖表突出特征。本圖表主要體現(xiàn)了四個(gè)國(guó)家在發(fā)電中對(duì)清潔能源的依賴程度較高，而對(duì)傳統(tǒng)的化石燃料使用較少。】

Hydropower was responsible for a major part of electricity generated in Finland and India. In Finland, a whopping 63% of electricity was produced in this way, which was slightly higher than that in India (50%). Fossil fuel was still accountable for the remaining 37% in this country while only a mere 5% was supplied by this source in India. Notably, people from India also made use of nuclear energy to supply 45% of their electricity, but Finlanders did not use this source at all in this process. 

【主體段1：芬蘭和印度的發(fā)電方式比較。二者的水力發(fā)電占比較高，因此分為一段】

Some different situations can be found in USA and France, where a greater part of electricity was yielded through the use of nuclear energy. It seems that France relied heavily on it, with 87% of electricity produced in this way. Nuclear was also a principal source for the USA (50%), and hydropower ranked the second (38%), almost tripling its proportion in France. French people depended totally on clean energy, while users from the USA still obtained 12% of electricity by burning fossil fuel. 

【主體段2：美國(guó)和法國(guó)的發(fā)電方式比較。二者都對(duì)核能發(fā)電依賴程度較高，因此分為一段?！?/strong>