4月29日雅思大作文真題參考范文 I 學(xué)生是否應(yīng)該評價(jià)老師？

2021年4月29雅思大作文題目

Some people think that in order to continue improving the quality of high school education, students should be encouraged to evaluate and criticise their teachers. Others, however, believe that this would result in the loss of respect and discipline for teachers. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

高分范文及解析

Introduction

It has been a long tradition that never should a middle school student assess or question his or her teachers; otherwise, he or she may be regarded as rebellious or even disrespectful. However, I, running counter to such old-fashioned thought, consider the assessment of teachers by students as justifiable and feasible.

解析

? 【解析】開門見山，直接點(diǎn)自己的立場。審題時(shí)，首先抓住題干中的核心：目的是什么？提升中學(xué)教育質(zhì)量。該目的將會是我們考慮優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)時(shí)的評價(jià)標(biāo)桿。

? question vt. 詢問；質(zhì)疑

? rebellious adj. 叛逆的

? run counter to 背離某事；與某事背道而馳

Concession & Refutation

Admittedly, it is reasonable for some to doubt the feasibility of such evaluation mode. Since most high school students are, to some extent, immature and impulsive, they may lack the ability to distinguish right from wrong or even sometimes make comments merely based on their personal emotions. In other words, it is due to the absence of objectivity that such practice may render the assessments’ reliability and validityin question. Besides, once empowered to comment on teachers, some students may feel that they dominate the class and thus act in a lofty manner, which may incur disciplinary problems. However, the aforementioned detriments can in effect be minimised as long as students are well-instructed and foster a correct attitude towards the given “power”.

解析

? 【解析】從“中學(xué)生”這一未成年人群體的特性（不成熟+沖動）出發(fā)，點(diǎn)出該特性可能會導(dǎo)致評估的信度和效度失真，亦或是學(xué)生態(tài)度和紀(jì)律問題（點(diǎn)題）。但是，該現(xiàn)象可避免。

? feasibility n. 可行性

? impulsive adj. 沖動的，魯莽的

? distinguish right from wrong 辨別好壞

? reliability n. 可靠度；信度

? validity n. 效度

? in question 有疑問的，被懷疑的

? empower vt. 授權(quán)

? dominate vt. 占據(jù)主導(dǎo)地位

? lofty adj. 傲慢的（貶義）

Argument

As a matter of fact, behind such practice are more profound significances. It is only when prompt feedback is solicited from students - the teaching objects – that can teachers ensure whether they have imparted the knowledge in an appropriate way that all the students are able to comprehend. Not surprisingly, this can allow teachers to instantly adjust teaching materials as well as the teaching pace for the sake of tailoring the classes to suit learners’ needs. Meanwhile, students are spurred to think critically instead of learning by rote or following blindly. Additionally, in a moral sense, such evaluation mode can in turn serve as a sound opportunity to teach students not to abuse the given power but to pose criticism in a respectful way.

解析

? 【解析】分別從學(xué)生和教師角度，點(diǎn)出“提升教育質(zhì)量”方面的好處。除了教學(xué)方面，這里的教育也可提到“德育”，反向論證：這不正是一個(gè)讓學(xué)生學(xué)會如何客觀且有禮評價(jià)師長的機(jī)會嘛？

? solicit sth. from sb. 向某人征求某物

? impart vt. 傳授

? comprehend vt. 理解

? tailor vt. 按需制作；使合適

? spur vt. 鼓勵

? learn by rote 死記硬背

? abuse vt. 濫用

Conclusion

To sum up, on the premise that students are well-instructed, the downsides of their evaluations on teachers pale into insignificance when set against the upsides.

解析

? 【解析】一句話總結(jié)：學(xué)生評價(jià)利大于弊，只要學(xué)生態(tài)度端正，客觀評價(jià)。

? pale into insignificance 使相形見絀